[ login / register author ]

Director

Dr. Sorin CACE


Scientific committee:

PhD, Professor Catalin ZAMFIR, Romanian Academy Member

PhD, Professor Asher BEN-ARIEH, Director of Haruv Institute, Ierusalim, Israel

PhD, Professor Gary B. MELTON, University of Colorado, Denver, USA

PhD, Professor John LUTZKER, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA

PhD, Professor Michael J. PALMIOTTO, Wichita State University, Kansas, USA

PhD, Professor Jill KORBIN, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA

Professor Keith HALEY, Tiffin University, Ohio, USA

PhD, Professor Jimmy TAYLOR, Ohio University, Zanesville, Ohio, USA

PhD, Professor Andrea WIGFIELD, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

PhD, Professor Elizabeth ECKERMANN, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia

PhD, Professor Renwu TANG, Dean of School of Management, Dean of Academy of Government at Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

PhD, Professor Amitabh KUNDU, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi , India

PhD, Professor Claude MARTIN, Scientific Director of CNRS, Rennes University, France

PhD, Professor Munyae M. MULINGE, United States International University (USIU), Nairobi, Kenya

PhD, Professor Manuel Antonio GARRETON, Chile University, Santiago de Chile, Chile

PhD, Professor Renata FRANC, Social Science Institute "Ivo Pilar", Zagreb, Croatia

PhD, Professor Asun LLENA BERNE, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

PhD, Professor Nawab Ali KHAN, Saman bin Abduaziz University, Al Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

PhD, Professor Nicolae SALI, "Universitatea Libera Internationala din Moldova", Chisinau, Moldova

PhD, Professor Mihaela TOMIŢĂ, "Universitatea de Vest", Timisoara

PhD, Professor Valeriu IOAN-FRANC, Director Adjunct al Institutului National de Cercetari Economice

PhD, Professor Corina CACE, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies

PhD, Professor Mircea ALEXIU, "Universitatea de Vest", Timisoara

PhD, Professor Stefan COJOCARU, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University, Iasi


ISSN

Print: 1582-8344

Electronic: 2247-6571


Articles:


THE ANALYZE OF THE DISCRIMINATION PHENOMENON FROM THE APPLICATIVE, LEGISLATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL POINT OF VIEW

Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the discrimination and tolerance/intolerance problem comparing with the Romanian work market.. In the first part of the article we underlined the perception of the interviewed institutional representatives about the intolerance and discrimination phenomenon. We were interested both of the attitudes as well as the relation behaviors together with the intervention in the fight against discrimination. As concerning the intolerance phenomenon, we analyzed the longitudinal evolution of the specificallyintolerance level of the 90’s Romania to present, we underlined starting factors of the intolerance situations and the signs for the tolerance phenomenon. As concerning the discrimination phenomenon, we classified the term depending on: the direct/indirect way of discrimination and the perceived differences, we detailed the professional discrimination forms; we underlined the perception of the experts concerning the definition and the manifestation mobbing situations. In the second part of the article we analyzed the perception of the experts that refers to the Romanian legislative and institutional situation with the role in fighting the discrimination phenomenon and mobbing. The legislative anti-discrimination field has some inconveniences, such as: the overwhelmingly bureaucratic juridical actions, the non exact framing of the harassment as a discriminatory act, the non defining of the mobbing and the indulgent sanction system for the discriminatory acts. At a legislative and institutional level , all the forms of discrimination and harassment are covered, but the concerned institutions do not have efficient appliance means for the legislation, because, the solving process is overwhelmingly bureaucratic and the complaints’ degree is very low because of the low level of knowledge of the population concerning this field.
Keywords
discrimination, tolerance, mobbing, legislative and institutional nondiscrimination framework.

Author
Andra PANAIT
Researcher, The Association for the Evolution and socio-economical Promoting of Catalactica, e-mail: andra_panait88@yahoo.com

How to cite
Panait, A. (2011). THE ANALYZE OF THE DISCRIMINATION PHENOMENON FROM THE APPLICATIVE, LEGISLATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL POINT OF VIEW, Journal of Community Positive Practices, Nr. 3/2011


Download full issueDownload article
Search





Current issue

JCPP Nr. 3 2017



Most Read

1. AGENTS OF COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT? THE POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN BANGLADESH

2. CONSUMPTION, CONSUMER CULTURE AND CONSUMER SOCIETY

3. PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER INEQUALITY AND THE BARRIER OF CULTURE ON EDUCATION

4. SOUTH ASIAN WOMEN AND THE LABOUR MARKET IN THE UK: ATTITUDES, BARRIERS, SOLUTIONS

5. COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS AS A COPING RESOURCE AMONG ADOLESCENTS LIVING UNDER ROCKETS FIRE: A SALUTOGENIC APPROACH




Resources

Transilvanian Review of Administrative Sciences

Revista de Sociologie Romaneasca

Revista de Cercetare si Interventie sociala

Revista Inovatia Sociala

Revista Calitatea Vietii

Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting




Statistics

Unique Visitators: 71929
Article Read: 979473



Users online

4 users are online.